Why the auteurist theory has become so important to film analysis Essay

Why the auteurist surmisal has become so important to film analysis - Essay ExampleThe paper throws light on the possibility of auteurism as a one of the most useful approaches to writing about films. Simply put, the auteurist possibility in cinema is based on the idea that in that respect should be identified a single creator of the film, with his own visionary approach just as we identify an antecedent for any work of dodge or literature. While within the auteurist theory film critics attempt to identify the films author, the theory also aims at to study the whole torso of work produced by one specific author, like, for example, studies devoted to Alfred Hitchcock. While critics of the second half of the 20th century recognized the theory very useful receivable its librating effect it allowed applying their initially naive suggestions about the role of authorship in a particular movie, it has acquired a more post-structural shape of late. To illustrate, within the latter t he auterurist theory allows examining the work of a certain director not as the expression of his genius, but as the site where a biography encounters a historical moment, an institutional context, and, lastly, an intertext. The usefulness of this theory is also determined by its practicality since it requires focusing on just one person. One of the major arguments against the auteurist theory is that it is believed that movies have nothing in common with any other form of arts, e.g. paintings. Rather they are viewed as results of collaborative efforts by a number of artists. It is argued that one person cannot be attribute with so much influence and importance that he/she is recognized the sole author of a movie. Another argument is that it is virtually impossible to identify a sole author since critics are not a part of films development and assess the movies auteur by a mere guess. Plus, the criticism of the auteurist theory deals with its suggested impact on boosting some direc tors egos and reducing the role of input by other members of the crew. Therefore, the criticism may be rely alike much on a personality of a director ignoring the contribution of other people. For example, in a marketing campaign of the Psycho film (1960), say by Alfred Hitchock, it was mentioned that that was the film by Hitchcock, which was intended to make people see the movie, although the most famous scene in the film, the shower scene, has been recognized the result of germinal collaborative work with Saul Bass. The Jaws is cited as a good example of the misunderstanding rooted in the auteurist approach. While the plot was conceived by Peter Benchley, an author of the related novel and a co-author of the screenplay (along with Carl Gottlieb), the film was shot by Bill Butler, edited by Verna Fidelis, and filled with compositions by Joh Williams, attributing the authorship of The Jaws to one single director seems unfair and not objective. Of course, Steven Spielbergs film sou nds goof for a marketing campaign, since it advertises the film by the use of the famous name, yet it is hard to protest with Goldman who asks, How in the world is Steven Spielberg the author of that? (Goldman, 1983, p.101). 8. After watching three of the ten movie clips listed in the Multimedia section, below, describe how they fit into a specific musical genre (or subgenre). What elements of the film are characteristic of that genre? How does it fulfill the expectations of that genre? How does it play against these expectations? I have watched two movie clips from